Haaretz
Left: Ben Faulding. Top right: Esther Freeman. Bottom right: Dasha Sominski.

What I Be Exhibit Comes to Crown Heights

A man with “Shvartze” − Yiddish for “black” and a derogatory term for African Americans − written across his forehead is one of the many startling images in the “What I Be” photography project, portraits of people with their greatest vulnerability written on their face or arm. It is a project of California-based photographer Steve Rosenfield, who in the rest of his professional life photographs rock bands and bar mitzvahs, and is currently in New York shooting images of young Jews.

More than a half dozen leading universities have brought Rosenfeld’s project to their campuses, and this week he expected to be at Yeshiva University − until the troubled modern Orthodox institution backed out.

Mati Esther Engel, a Stern College for Women student and avid photographer, was visiting a friend at Princeton last spring when she happened upon “What I Be” project photos there. Finding them unexpectedly moving, she thought students at Stern and Yeshiva University’s college for men would enjoy participating. The photographer was interested and Yeshiva University agreed to consider the project, but after four months of intense negotiations, after Rosenfield and student organizers agreed to numerous constraints YU required, and just two weeks before he was to arrive in New York to start taking pictures, YU backed out.

When Engel first approached YU administrators about “What I Be,” they said they were interested but there wasn’t enough organizing time to hold the shoot at Hanukkah time, Engel said. So she and another Stern student, Dasha Sominski, agreed to wait until January and YU agreed to move ahead. Then YU said they needed student signatures to prove widespread interest. Engel and Sominski collected more than 100 in one day. YU administrators said they were unable to supply the $5,000 that universities generally pay Rosenfield to cover his time and expenses. He agreed to accept $1,500. YU told the students they needed to raise the money themselves from various YU clubs. They obtained commitments of $100 from 11 different clubs that have budgets of just $300-500 for the whole year.

After Engel and Sominski had spent some 50 hours meeting with YU officials to work out the project’s details, and agreed to bar students from referring to certain issues in their portraits in order to comport with YU’s culture, the university backed out.

Haaretz made several requests to speak with YU administrators on the issue. University staff declined, responding only with an emailed statement by YU’s dean of students, Chaim Nissel: “As a university based on Torah ideals, Yeshiva University supports and encourages the artistic exploration of diverse ideas by its students and offers robust programming in dramatics and the arts − all while keeping in line with our values. After close review and much discussion of this event with the student organizers, and taking the sensitivities of all of our students into consideration, we determined that a YU venue would not be able to showcase the project in its entirety.”

YU has in recent months been confronted with a $380 million lawsuit brought by 34 former students who say they were abused by faculty at a university-affiliated high school.

“YU administrators told us ’we don’t know how to censor it,’” Engel told Haaretz. “I am sensitive to Yeshiva’s ideology. But many deans and the head of the counseling center sat around and said ‘there’s no way to judge objectively what the parameters should be, so we’re not doing it.’ YU cares so much about protecting its public image, but while doing so undermines it.”

Engel and Sominski moved ahead anyway. They expanded the project to include both YU students and Jews in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Rosenfield agreed to waive his fee entirely and is crashing in students’ apartments rather than at a hotel. Engel, Sominski and a few other people are covering the cost of his airfare. Each of the 78 participants is paying $10 to defray the cost of printing the photos. The resulting portraits are going up on Facebook as they are taken, and will be displayed at a Crown Heights art gallery from February 22.

“What I Be” photographs depict clothed men and women, from their shoulders up, with what the subjects feel is their deepest pain, their greatest vulnerability. But first Rosenfield spends 30 minutes or more interviewing them to help identify what that might be.

In her portrait Sominski has “I was NOT sleeping” on her forehead. Accompanying it will be her personal statement: “I am not my molestation.” Sominski, 20, had not shared with anyone except sisters and an ex-girlfriend that she was repeatedly molested as a young girl in St. Petersburg, Russia. “In that 30-minute interview Steve uncovered something that I hadn’t even talked about in two years of therapy,” she told Haaretz.

Ben Faulding, 30, a member of Crown Heights’ Chabad community, has a black father and a white Jewish mother. In his portrait, “shvartze” [the Yiddish word for black, used as a derogatory term] is written on his forehead. He became religious as an adult after growing up on Long Island, where he attended public schools and his biracial identity wasn’t much of an issue. It became more of one when he moved to Crown Heights, he told Haaretz.

“You hear on a daily basis ‘shvartze this’ and ‘shvartze that,’” he said. “It’s just part of conversation among many Jews there.” And though rarely addressed to him, “it’s unpleasant,” said Faulding, who works at a day treatment center for developmentally disabled adults.

Esther Freeman, 29, a mother of four young children and singer-songwriter who performs for women in the religious community, has written on her cheek and forehead, just below her sheitel (wig), “You Just Want Attention.” “It’s something I heard over and over as a child,” she said. “My family would tell me ‘oh you’re such a drama queen.’ I grew up thinking maybe I don’t trust my emotions because of that.

“I’m very Orthodox, but I feel like we live in such an emotionally closed world. Today, if anything, children need to be emotionally aware. There needs to be a lot more acceptance, especially in frum (observant) circles, and understanding,” Freeman told Haaretz as she prepared to perform for 3,000 female Chabad emissaries at their annual conference’s banquet.

Rosenfield, who is 38 and lives in Sacramento, has dreadlocks and looks much like Israeli singer Idan Raichel did a few years back. Rosenfield hasn’t been Jewishly involved since his bar mitzvah, and told Haaretz he considers himself spiritual rather than religious.

He has never experienced anything like he did with YU. “It was frustrating,” he said. Sending his contract back and forth with YU administrators, “I adjusted it for the school to get them to agree, I met all their needs, and it still got turned down.”

But he is glad that the project “What I Be: Jews of NYC” has moved ahead anyway. “It’s been really fun to experience the different culture [of religious Jews]. The rules, their lifestyle, are different for a lot of them. But for the most part their insecurities have pretty much been the same as everybody else’s. It doesn’t matter what religion or race we are, or where we live. We’re all experiencing the same stuff.”

In the end, Engel said, after a long day of shooting YU students, it was a good thing that the project is independent of YU. “It’s impossible to censor people’s insecurities and I don’t think YU would have been able to contain it. It’s better off this way.”

22 Comments

  • Publicity stunt

    Seems like everyone fell for some photographer’s publicity stunt. This idea of posing people with ” vulnerability written on their face or arm.” is very unoriginal.

    It’s been done a thousand times before.

  • strange

    people need to start building themselves up from the inside and outwards cuz it wont work the other way around.

    good luck to all those who need to vent their emotions this way…hope you find a more effective way of dealing with them.

  • awacs

    Strongly disagree: ‘shvartze’ is NOT a derogatory term! It means ‘black.’ It is no more derogatory than ‘black.’

    • Ash

      Anybody that doesnt live under a rock knows that this term has been used for decades in a derogatory way to refer to people that are black. Sure, it can be used to refer to items that are black as well but its well known that shvartze is not a complimentary or benign way to refer to black people and never will be.

  • pathetic

    not too far from wearing a tattoo.
    This just screams for attention even worse then people who feel the need to tell everyone on facebook that they just cut their toenails and are now going to lol blow their nose kind of like.

  • Words

    Yeah #4…because words in the English language don’t have more than one meaning?? Come on. Over time even neutral words become poisonous. Connotation matters.

  • so glad to see the comments are normal

    this all started with the vanity plates and the signs in the back window of the cars “mother in law on board”
    “baby on board” “honor student on board” etc. etc.
    why does it all have to hang out?
    Facebook merely promotes this nonsense and has desensitized us as human beings.
    As for this young man complaining that he hears the word Shvartze it’s unfortunate that he takes it as a personal insult. It is merely a description – no different than someone pointing out an Asian, a Jew, a really tall person, a goy etc. If they meant it as a derogatory remark they would not be saying it in your face. The fact that they do proves it is not meant as an insult.

  • A Proud Black

    To # 4
    You are correct. It is not the word in and of itself, it is the manner in which it is used and intended that makes it derogatory. It also provides a good cover as merely using a yiddish translation of a German word.

  • Where have we gone?

    Would you pass the Rebbe for dollars with this (you actually didn’t have to, the Rebbe knew it all without the scribbling on faces)

  • white priviledge

    Brilliant project!!!
    to #’s4 and 7, unless you two are black, you have no right to deem what others find offensive. if a black person is telling you the term “schvartze” is derogatory, how dare you disagree?????? dont be so arrogant as to assume the innocence of a word that over time has come to be rejected and unwelcomed by the objective view point. either use the word “black”, or better yet, find another way to describe people withoit referring to their skin colour.

  • CH

    It definitely is not referring to skin color per say. It is a derogatory term. However, we have a right to that. See news stories all the time. Live with it. And if someone says derogatory about Jews or Lubavitch or B Ts. or gezsha. it does not bother me. It only bothers you because you feel it hits home. You are a shvartzer but a good decent one so be happy about. That.

    • Ash

      Easy to say it here in a jewish forum. Try going up to black people on the street and say this word to them and let me know what happens.
      What YOU think is derogatory does not matter, its the person that you put this label on that matters.

  • : )

    Why just can everyone get along. And be happy for someone that is trying to make a living. And who really cares about how a certain word is used to describe somebody. Remember my friends ((think outside The BOX))

  • Mati Engel

    If anyone is sincerely curious about what the What I Be Project is all about I would be more than happy to tell you more about it. It’s easy to quickly jump to conclusions about things you don’t fully understand. This project is actually very deep and very meaningful. Please feel free to email me with any concerns or questions : mati.esther.engel@gmail.com

    Additionally, here is an article that covers many bases of what the project aims to accomplish.

    http://www.yuobserver.org/2014/01/what-they-be-an-interview-with-the-students-who-started-it-all/

    Thank you and much love.

  • Mati Engel

    Interesting Story:

    Before running this project I actually reached out to some yeshivish and Modern Orthodox Rabbi’s to get their opinion on the matter. All 4 rabbi’s said that the project will have both positive and negative outcomes– but that the good will ultimately outweigh the bad.

    I also asked a question to the Igrot about whether or not to do the project, while I was visiting friends in Crown Heights. The response that I got was the following.

    ” Make sure to print it, because it will be beneficial to the public good”– Perhaps the rebbe was on board too?

    Much love to my fellow Jews. I hope this project only sheds light to the fact that through struggle comes strength and from darkness comes the purest light. Embrace vulnerability and allow yourself and others to be human.