Posted to Op-Ed on

Op-Ed: Shopping Bag Tax Hurts Real New Yorkers

The proposed five-cent tax on plastic shopping bags being considered by the NYC Council will hurt real New Yorkers, argues Councilman David Greenfield.

by David Greenfield – Yeshiva World News

As New Yorkers, we are fortunate to live in one of the most beautiful cities in the world, and it is our responsibility to keep it that way. It’s a responsibility I take seriously, both in my role as a member of the City Council and as a life-long New Yorker who was literally born, raised and currently lives with my family in the neighborhood that I am fortunate to represent in City Hall. I can understand, then, why some might be surprised by my opposition to a bill that would impose a tax on the use of plastic bags in order to reduce waste in New York City. After all, I sponsored the Council’s most popular initiative, NYC Cleanup, which pays to clean the streets of every single council district. Every day, you can see folks sweeping the streets of 16th Avenue and Avenue J in my district, for example, thanks to this initiative. My opposition to this plastic bag tax, however, is a principled one. Let me explain.

The legislation in question, Intro 209A, would impose a five-cent tax on all paper and plastic bags given out by stores. The idea, the bill’s proponents tell us, is that requiring consumers to pay for bags will motivate them to bring reusable bags when they go shopping. It’s not a new idea: bag fees and taxes have been imposed in cities across the country, from Washington to Seattle. The problem is that they don’t work.

Take Austin, Texas, for example: City officials banned plastic bags there in 2013. Two years later, they found that the decrease in such bags through the city’s waste systems had been more than made up for by people simply throwing away their reusable bags. A commission appointed by the city to study the program’s results noted in its assessment that “the results do not indicate a clear success,” pointing out that reusable bags have a “very high carbon footprint compared to the single use bag.” The report concluded: “Simply reducing the usage of a product does not guarantee a positive environmental or economic impact … it is necessary to consider all viewpoints when broad reaching legislation is enacted.”  We should pay attention to the lesson Austin offers.

This bill’s sponsors, however, don’t want us to consider Austin — or Chicago, or Los Angeles, or Seattle, all of which have seen similarly murky results. Instead, Intro 209A’s sponsors say, we should turn our attention to Washington D.C. It is there, they tell us, that a plastic bag ban has successfully reduced usage by as much as 60%. That’s an impressive number – if it’s accurate. But DC’s own chief financial officer said in 2009 that there was no reliable estimate of plastic bag use in the District, meaning there is no way of knowing how effective the ban may have been. Washington, DC’s own Department of Public Works admitted to me last year in a New York City Council hearing that their estimates are based on “back-of-the-envelope” calculations. And The Washington Post wrote in a 2015 analysis that there is “little evidence” that such a large reduction in usage occurred.

Furthermore, the legislation being considered in New York is actually worse than what was implemented in D.C., for one key reason: In Washington, the 5-cent fee went into a city fund, to be used to clean up the notoriously filthy Anacostia River. Like the ban itself, that fund has had mixed results, but at least an effort was made to put the revenue gained by the ban to good use.

The bill currently under consideration in New York, on the other hand, would let store owners retain the fee they charge for single-use bags. I want to be clear: The bag tax now under consideration in New York is, by design, a massive giveaway by politicians to wealthy business owners. It’s a gift, at the current rate of plastic bag usage, of as much as $260 million per year, that will be paid for out of the pockets of low-income families. If there is something progressive about taking money from poor people and giving it to multi-million dollar corporations like Shoprite, I must have missed it.

While five cents for a plastic bag may not sound like much to the types of people who are supporting this legislation, the fact is that there are many families in New York for whom every nickel counts. I remember growing up watching people at the checkout counter returning items because they simply couldn’t afford them. For an average family in my district that uses 40 shopping bags a week, that’s a $100 annual tax. The city should not force New Yorkers to hand over their hard-earned money for the benefit of wealthy retailers to support a change in policy that won’t work. Instead, we should fund educational programs to encourage New Yorkers to reuse and eventually recycle their paper and plastic bags. In my family, for example, we use the plastic bag to take home the groceries, then we use it to send our kids’ lunch to school, and finally it makes its way to our small garbage cans as a liner.

I can’t support a massive giveaway to retailers paid for from the pockets of my constituents, especially to support a policy that doesn’t even work. That’s why I plan to vote no on the proposed bag tax.


  • 1. Picaboo Shimon wrote:

    I agree with councilman Greenfield.

    Instead of charging a bag tax, let’s pass a law forcing stores to give a discount to those who bring reusable bags.

    • 2. Milhouse wrote:

      Why should they give a discount? It’s hardly any cheaper for them — a bag doesn’t cost them 5 cents — so where should this money come from? The only place it can come from is you – by raising prices, so that you end up paying the same as this senseless tax.

      In San Francisco the bag law resulted in an E-Coli breakout, because people don’t realize that they have to put their reusable bags in the wash between uses. And the cost of all this laundry, together with the wear on the bags, means it ends up costing more than the plastic bags.

  • 3. DeClasse' Intellectual wrote:

    Some stores in the southwest like Sprouts and so forth give the customer some what of discount from five cents up if they bring their own bags.. Maybe that approach might work instead

  • 4. Yossi A. wrote:

    I believe that Whole food gives a 10¢ discount if you don’t take s bag.
    Then again there prices make up for that “DISCOUNT “

  • 5. yes but we see plastic bags flying all over wrote:

    g everywhere, they land in trees, sidewalks, water ways, unbeknown to most of us, an article in hamodia paper a few months ago about the environment dept pressing the city to clean up it water ways of tiny pices of plastic in the water for 5 years, now the city added new chemicals which makes the water worest, to us ,it’s blocking our pipes all over the city you can image that it blocks your mind and body from working well also, we need to have a huge outcry to the city to remove this chemical and clean up our water ways for our health please call the 212 new york and say so may we be finally successfull and then filtering the water will make a huge differences too

  • 6. yankel wrote:

    contact your councilperson and them to vote against this proposal.

  • 7. Australia wrote:

    We have strong green bags that we buy so that we can shop. The bags last for about 5 years and stop me from using many plastic bags each week.
    Tissues, toilet paper, cereal boxes all go into these versatile bags. All non perishable goods like coffee, tea etc are safely transported home from the supermarket.
    If you are concerned about hygiene, just use the disposable bags for meat, fish and the like.
    We have been using these bags for over ten years and it has resulted in a much cleaner country and BTW, I have never heard of anyone developing any illness from the reused bags.

    • 8. Milhouse wrote:

      E Coli is not just on meat and fish. Vegetables are a major source. And just because you haven’t heard of anyone getting sick doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. People get sick all the time and you have no idea why. The fact is that in San Francisco the incidence of E Coli infections went up directly after they implemented a bag law.

      And if you think Australia is a cleaner country because of this law, you’re delusional.

  • 9. Uncle Mendel wrote:

    Great Idea ! I make a purchase from a grocer, bring the bag back, and purchase some perishables. I get sick from contaminated perishables, sue, and become rich !!!!
    Sounds like a Jewish Money Making scheme to me.

  • 10. They Don't Exist wrote:

    Plastic bags come from fossil fuels, and many of said fossils were dinosaurs, which never actually existed any more than mermaids and unicorns, so why are we having a conversation about mythological creatures?

  • 12. The Solipsist wrote:

    Dear number 9

    You are wrong – dinasours do actually exist according to the Torah. It’s really very simple:

    According to Quantum Theory, reality only comes into existance once a conscious observer collapses the wave front. Therefore, as soon as wrote this article, dinosaurs retroactively sprang into existance so that plastic bags and Bernie Sanders could exist. Mermaids (really naids, but tha’s splitting white hairs) came into existance so that Hillary could win the election against Donal Trump, whom the GOP promised us was only a mythological creature

  • 13. They Don't Exist wrote:

    #11: Very nice using highfalutin pseudo-scientific terminology to express your apikorsisness! If what you say is true, the world is retroactively millions of years old, which is GARBAGE SHE’B’GARBAGE! Do teshuva before shabbos. Mashiach now!


Comments are closed.