Christopher Hitchens: The Fall of a Worthy Adversary
A journalist friend of mine emailed me at 1am Friday morning to tell me that Christopher Hitchens had died. The news brought with it a deep sadness and I instantly recited the Jewish prayer upon hearing of the passing of a friend, “Blessed is the true Judge.” That instinctive religious action captured the paradox of our unpredictable friendship, born in battle in four public debates – stretching from 2004 until 2010 – on G-d, faith, evolution, and religion, but solidified over food at kosher restaurants, kosher wines, and, of course, healthy swigs of whisky.
We were planning, over the last few months, to do another debate on whether the Jews are the Chosen people, and given Hitchens discovery that he was Jewish only when his mother revealed it to him in his twenties, the subject held a particular interest for him. Back and forth we went, trying to find a time that might suit him as he awaited the literal return of the voice he had lost to his treatment against esophageal cancer. His mother had also told him that she planned to move to Israel where the Jews were making the desert bloom, a move that was never carried out due to her tragic suicide. In one of my many interviews with Hitchens on my radio show I asked him, given his mother’s growing attachment to her people, what it would have meant to him for her to live to see the substantial Jewish intellectual following he would one day amass, and he told me that it would have made him very happy to see her proud. He further shared with me how, amid his passionate atheism, he took pride in his Jewishness due to Jewry’s immense emphasis on learning and scholarship and being the people of the book.
When I first heard that Christopher was sick I called upon all fellow people of faith to pray for him and asked him on my radio show if the gesture offended him. He responded that he was deeply flattered even as he was sure there was noone listening. But pray we did, a great many of us, because amid his being the most famous atheist in the world, there was something immensely likeable about him that endeared him to friend and foe alike. He was religion’s most vociferous enemy but you could not help but develop an affection for him due to his warmth, wit, and, bizarre as it may sound, humility. Unlike hate-filled atheists like Richard Dawkins whose principal contribution to the world is to detest people with whom they disagree, Hitchens may have had a problem with G-d but he had no such problem with His children. He was one of the world’s most strident and eloquent defenders of human freedom, going so far as to break with the left-wing intelligentsia in strongly supporting the invasion of Iraq to protest Saddam’s brutalization of his people. Indeed it is immensely ironic – or if you’re more inclined to faith, providential – that he died on the very day that the United States announced the end to the nine-year war in Iraq, a conflict that he brought his unparalleled eloquence to defend because of his hatred of tyranny in all forms.
Hitchens continued that trend by using his mighty pen to inveigh against any political regime whom he perceived to trample on the innocent. As an essayist he had no equal and as a debater – and I have seen more than my fair share – he had few who could better him. One only entered into the verbal boxing ring with him with the keen knowledge that it would be a fight to the death.
But for all his fame he was evinced an accessibility that made him unique. Write him an email and, after a day or two, he would invariably write back, not just a line but many paragraphs. And there was always some unique turn of phrase that brought a smile.
Not that it was always like that. After publishing G-d is Not Great, I detected a hardening in him against people of faith that I found out-of-character and, in February, 2008, we held a take-no-prisoners debate at the 92nd St. Y over the existence of G-d that has now been viewed by nearly three quarters of a million people. He had written in his anti-religious screed that Jewish courts in Israel had ruled that a Jew may not save the life of a non-Jew on the Sabbath. I publicly pledged to buy 100 copies of his book for 100 Rabbis if he could cite even a single such instance and he quoted a source that later turned out to be a famous fraud perpetrated by academic Israel Shahak. I was incensed and wrote Hitchens that he had always prided himself on the truth and had to correct the false information he had disseminated. He wrote back that he would amend the assertion in the book’s next printing, and our relationship cooled.
But while the announcement of his esophageal cancer did not soften him on G-d, it did soften him on people of faith, surprised as he was at the huge outpouring of support and prayer from people of every religion. We agreed to stage a public discussion on the afterlife which took place before 1000 people at the Cooper Union in September, 2010, the night before Yom Kippur, Judaism’s holiest day. The debate saw an entirely new exchange between me and Christopher, one where we did not seek to eviscerate each other’s arguments so much as soberly and respectfully discuss one of life’s most profound mysteries. When the debate was over I sent him a case of kosher wine for the Jewish holidays and told him its purpose was to have him and his friends toast, “L’Chaim,” the ancient Jewish call for a long life. He wrote back that he was grateful for the gesture and had already finished the case.
I have no doubt that Christopher Hitchens will have an afterlife. As one of the most original and provocative writers of his generation, his words will continue to mesmerize, incite, confound, and entertain. As an atheist who challenged America’s deeply held religious convictions, he will continue to serve as a thorn in the side of those who believe that religion requires no rational defense. And for those of us who were privileged to know him, he will be remembered as a warm and engaging presence who, ever the iconoclast, was never afraid to swim alone against strong social currents.
No doubt you are now finally resting in peace Christopher given that, wherever you are, you finally have the answer to that great question of G-d’s existence you always debated.
avrahom
Hi Shmuley, Sorry you lost a friend. The Rambam writes that when a wicked person dies you make a festive meal. This person caused tens of thousands to stop believing in the Divine Creator . A person who causes another to sin in worse than killing him. The fact that he was intelligent and had a nice personality has nothing to do with it.
Feh!
Feh!
crownheights.info, Shmuly,
this is wrong!
not everything is fit to publicize on this web site.
who needs to read this?
why do you give ANY attention to the actions of an aggressive anti g-d, anti jew?
“do not stray after your heart” viloi sosuru acharei livavchem….
it’s not OK.
Andrea Schonberger
This guy was a cool dude, there will never be another like him, and he will be missed. I enjoyed his writings and television interviews. He was extremely provacative and that was his intention–he made you THINK which today, sadly to admit, most people don’t do anymore. It’s easier to fall in lock-step than to stick out like a sore thumb, and I ought to know. And to Dear #1, if you honestly believe that Hitchens caused people to stop believing in G-d, then perhaps they never really believed in the first place.
TO # 3
TO #3
Andrea,
if you want someone to make you think, learn chassidus , like “ein beis” from the Rebbe Rashab for example.
That “cool dude” (lihavdil) didn’t have true intellectual honesty, he was interested in fulfilling his own beastly desires and to that end, played mental games, with the facts and the truth, trying convince himself and everyone else, of his self proclaimed righteousness.
learn chassidus
Peretz
Boruch Shalom Rachamim
Sounds like a Tinoik Shenishba. Needs alot of prayer.
haters
christopher hitchens was brilliant, perhaps the greatest intellectual mind of our time. yes, he had his faults, but he has made a deep lasting impression, one which no one will ever replicate! thank you shmuley for writing this!
mp
people! He is a fellow jew, so enough with the loshon hara, let alone speaking ill of the dead. #5 is right, you should be feeling bad for him that he was misled.
bssides the man was a sharp and brilliant person, you’re all just jealous of his smarts.
ayin bais class
want ayin bais?
Rabbi Simon Jacobson gives a class here:
http://www.youtube.com/watc…
Rotting
I’m sure he’s wishing there was no afterlife where he is at
Sad to see this article by Shmuly
It is sad to read this article amongst few others in recent month written by Shmuly Boteach.
It seems he would write anything conterversal for attention.
Mendy Hecht
Jewish atheists like Hitchens are like the kid who “runs away from home” for one hour by hiding in the backyard and leaving a “ransom note” taped to the front door reading:
“If you want to see your son alive again, leave $500 in the mailbox.
Love,
Your son.”
SB Debate fan
Shmuly Botaach I love lisening to your debates with him. Although I wish you learned more chasidus or at least consulted with a few more chasideshe people so that you would have a few more correct answers.
I never undrestood why Shmuly – or G-d’s side – has the burdon of proof. I say: The one that holds “a creation has no creator” should have the burdon of profe. I wish Shmuly would start the debate by spilling some water and say “ oh, I see a gourgous mosiac picture forming – NOT!
I love R. Botach’s points ”the eye has thousands of conections,“ and the earth would freez or burn if it was not in the correct spot.
I could see Hitchkins telling g-d: ”Hey I had to make a living.”
thank you
i have always enjoyed watching him debate. it has made my faith stronger. i know that may sound strange, but it has.
Charvona
If you write an obituary, leave yourself out of it. Unless, or course, you’re writing to ride the wave of the wake created by another’s loss.
But, Shmuly’s piece does belong on this site. He and this site care more about sales and eyeballs than the hard-core religiousness they both officially represent.
There’s no room in the weak ultra-orthodox limelight for Apikorsim, heretics, atheists. You may not enter a church, read a book or study another theology. According to proper haredi etiquite Hitchens should not get a mention. But Shmuly needs to sell himself and books and this site likes readers and responders.
to #14
i bet your head is so deep deep deeeeeeep in the sand….
Neill Abrams
This is a welcome and thought-provoking article. Thank you for writing it. Faith is a deeply personal way of understanding one’s place in the universe and a guide to conducting relationships with other living beings. Those who believe they have a monopoly on truth, and therefore that billions of others on this planet must be wrong or misguided, will never understand why there is value in listening to and understanding another person’s point of view. They are all the poorer for it.