by Rabbi Yoseph Kahanov Jax, FL
Can you be too religious? Ought one to deprecate a person whose religious observance seems “Over the top?” Are the terms “Ultra-Kosher,” or “Ultra-Orthodox,” really objective?

Holier Than Thou – How Religious Is Too Religious?

“What you are not allowed, you are not allowed, what you are allowed you need not.”(Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi)

Can you be too religious? Ought one to deprecate a person whose religious observance seems “Over the top?”  Are the terms “Ultra-Kosher,” or “Ultra-Orthodox,” really objective?

I always found it interesting how my observant grandparents and great grandparents were simply called “Jewish.” When Reform and Conservative Judaism made its debut my observant parents were called “Orthodox Jews,” and now with the increase of assimilation I’ve become an “Ultra Orthodox Jew.” You can be sure that I’m not any more religious than my grandfather or great grandfather, so why does my name keep changing?

This week’s portion, Kedoshim, narrated during Israel’s extended encampment at Mt. Sinai, commands us to be holy: “And G-d spoke to Moses saying: ‘Speak to the entire Community of Israel and tell them you must be Holy, for I, the Lord Your G-d, am Holy,’” (Vayikra 19:1-2).

The concept of holiness seems abstract. Holiness cannot be detected by means of the five senses. Holiness is not a visual experience, nor can it be heard, smelled, felt or tasted. Moreover, one person’s idea of holiness can be very different from another’s. In fact, to some people holiness is about the destruction of others – just consider all of the “Holy wars” fought over the course of human civilization. A precise definition of holiness is indeed elusive.

Still, the Torah does not speak of holiness as an abstract, remote quality, but rather one that is real and can be acquired.

It appears that this is why Rambam (Maimonides) interprets holiness as a general commandment: “In all the commandments that one performs one ought to strive to attain the sublime objective of holiness.  Perhaps one could obey the commandments without specific intent, but holiness cannot be achieved without such intent.”

The commandments bring a person closer to holiness, but they do not confer holiness. Therefore we say, in the benedictions which we recite: “Who has sanctified us by His commandments” and not “Through whose commandments we have become sanctified.” Sanctity is not attained by obeying the commandments in a routine manner.

In order to become sanctified we must do more than simply obey the commandments. We are obliged to strive and act with specific intent in order to actually rise to holiness.  By obeying the Mitzvos with intention we lift ourselves to a higher state.  Holiness is, hence, not abstract or remote, but rather something that can be expressed in man’s every deed. When man’s deeds bespeak G-d’s praise, then his actions are holy.

The Torah’s approach to holiness is clearly irreconcilable with the notion that it represents some esoteric quality. The Torah’s view is that holiness is something real, concrete – attainable through man’s dedicated belief and behavior consistent with mitzvah observance.

Ramban (Nachmanides), in his famous analysis of this overarching commandment, explains how our approach and method of observing Torah and Mitzvos defines our level of holiness. It is not enough to technically observe the mitzvos; Torah observant Jews must be refined. He points out how one can observe all the laws of the Torah and still be a boor.

There are unproscribed things, asserts Nachmanides, things which are permitted by the Torah, from which one should nevertheless abstain. He cites, as an example, refraining from excessive sexual relations, excess drinking, and guarding one’s mouth from vulgar eating or vulgar speech. He dubs those who have these traits as “Naval Birshut HaTorah,” which amounts to a base person with a certificate of Kashrus, for after all, they do not violate the letter of the law.

In depicting this “Scoundrel with the permission of the Torah,” Nachmanides emphasizes the tendency of man to constantly seek out material and physical pleasure – while no particular prohibitions may be involved; the entire essence of Judaism is distorted by such attitudes.

“You shall be holy,” maintains the Ramban, is achieved by sanctifying yourself with that which is permitted to you.  Only when you give up that which is permitted; when you initiate an act of giving something up, and only when it adds something to the commandments – a sort of value added component – only then does it lead to sanctity.

In summation, you cannot be too religious, or too holy, more than you can be too good or too happy. To be too holy is like being too in love; it’s one of those things that if a little bit is good then more is even better.  Who could understand this better than a society that is proudly and unabashedly “Fanatic” about its sundry sports, rock groups and TV shows?

It seems only fair that if you can’t be too crazy about your favorite rock band or foot ball team, then you should not be able to be too crazy about G-d, especially when you consider the fact that He created your favorite musical icon or sports team.

May we take the message of this week’s Parshios to heart and become “Ultra Holy,” at least as much as the devoted sports fan. In doing so we will transform the world into a G-dly domain, which will in turn hasten the coming of the righteous Moshiach BBA.

8 Comments

  • Milhouse

    The main thing is מהיות טוב אל תקרא רע. If someone is more careful in his observance than you, if he keeps chumros or hidurim that you don’t, it’s your duty to admire him and not chas vesholom to mock him just to make yourself feel good. Yes, he is better than you. Accept it.

  • The Real Deal

    The crucial aspect of a person’s “frumkeit” is are they consistent in their level or are they hypocritical ? If a person is all bent out of shape / obsessive about their religious standards ( and those of their family ) but is not ethical, is full of themselves, or displays bad midos
    then what differnce does it make if they never miss a minyan ? It’s all a farce. I recently spoke to family members of a true Talmid Chocham who said that also their father never had any need for goshmius, he was insistent that his children not be deprived – he even bought jewelry for his wife and daughters ! He was secure enough in his avoda that he didn’t have to “enforce” his level onto his family. Unfortunately, there is sometimes a thin line between sincere observance and compulsive behaviors that mask in being “super frum.” A reminder : Our youth can smell hypocrisy from a mile away . Emesdik Yiddishkeit is a very beautiful thing – let’s aim to be authentic in all our ways.

  • Go-ds right hand man

    With a bit of experience my answer to a eternal question is when the individual feels compelled to act as a law enforcement officer and spouts without understanding words a prophet would, however when a community does it is a different story to be a light into the nations/role models ! Use religion to find the ways of go-d ! Don’t use religion as a rod !

  • Reuven

    Milhouse is correct!!

    Admire me!!! I am SO frum that I don’t even eat in my own house.

    • Milhouse

      Nu, if you subsist on few foods because of a genuine concern about some halochol, then ein hochi nami you are admirable. In Sefer Hasichos there’s a story about an am ho’oretz who didn’t know hilchos birchos hanehenin, so he only ever ate the very few things whose brochos he had managed to learn. That’s a tzadik..

  • About time

    The Real Deal is right! Especially the point “Our youth can smell hypocrisy from a mile away.” I wish more people in the community could fully internalize this message.